Most traders spend years of inane efforts without achieving consistent profitability due to a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the edge in
the activity of financial trading. They are in fact looking for (purely hypothetical) information contained within the market data and essentially
guessing and chasing price movements, often through indicators and signals while neglecting
Historical Trading Information (HTI)
self-generated by their own trading activity. As a matter of fact the lack of an edge is fundamentally imputable to the lack of HTI utilization
in the formulation of future orders. It turns out that losses are an expression of "loss" (or disregard) of such type of information.
What is the foundational cause of lack of consistent long-term profitability
Disregarding the self-generated HTI will generally lead to unprofitability for several reasons:
- Loss of information (not data information, but HTI): Neglecting the self-generated Historical Trading Information (HTI) can lead to significant drawbacks. Many traders focus primarily on predicting some aspect of the market, whether directional or related to dispersion (volatility), on short-term price trends. They formulate "local" bets with
independent trades, often with some form of stop-loss and take-profit without considering the broader context of their entire trading activity.
- Order Cloud Inconsistency: As a result of this loss of HTI, executing trades independently—without conditioning the probability of new orders on the structure of the already executed orders—can lead to a situation where the average price of buy orders ends up being higher than the average price of sell orders. This scenario defines long-term unprofitability.
- Failure to utilize (induced) price recurrence: By disregarding the HTI, especially the portions related to the most unfavorable orders, traders miss the opportunity to leverage that information in forecasting future new orders. This can result in a critical loss of vital insights. The ongoing failure to take advantage of the emerging order cloud during trading activity ultimately destabilizes the trading account, leading to long-term unprofitability.
It has been formally proven that utilizing the HTI leads to strategies that are, in the long run, vastly superior to any strategy that does not incorporate it. In other words, failing to use the HTI results in
uniformly dominated and conceptually
inadmissible trading strategies.
This breakthrough result, found in the seminal
paper
by Prof.
T. Gastaldi
, is referred to as the
Universal Statistical Edge (USE) principle.
Thus, while there is a mathematical proof of a real and objective statistical edge, many traders still chase the illusion of information hidden in the data—an unfalsifiable stance akin to guessing and gambling rather than strategically trading based on true statistical insights. This sort of statistical ignorance and fallacious belief, however, forms the very foundation upon which market makers thrive.
By relocating orders (e.g., moving them to a different time or price) and exploiting the
natural or "induced" recurrence of prices, while taking into account the full HTI (rather than just the last entry point, as is common in many naïve approaches), traders can achieve, over time, a theoretically
unbounded improvement compared to any strategy that does not utilize the HTI.
Universal Statistical Edge (USE) Principle: A Necessary Condition for Building A True Edge
The Universal Statistical Edge Principle emphasizes that effective trading strategies must rely on historically informed decisions.
While having a theoretical edge is a crucial prerequisite, it represents a necessary condition. In the real world, we must also allow this edge to emerge within the
constraints of available capital. It is, in fact, obvious that any type of edge, no matter how effective, cannot guarantee success, especially when there is excessive exposure.
This aspect is easy to understand in practice. Some intuition can be drawn from the Kelly criterion.
While it does not apply directly to the complex setup of trading—where we cannot assume the independence of orders—it exemplifies a fundamental principle. In a simple
independent betting setup, even with a strong probability in your favor, there is always a bet size that can lead to bankruptcy before the edge starts working for you,
regardless of how good it is (Kelly, 1956).
While the Kelly criterion provides valuable insights into managing exposure, its foundational assumptions, such as the independence of bets (or orders), do not align with the realities of real-world trading. The USE Principle emphasizes that to formulate non-dominated trading strategies effectively, traders must condition the probabilities of future orders based on **Historical Trading Information (HTI)** obtained from past trading activity.
More Essential Pillars for Success:
- Effective Hedging: The ability to hedge effectively when market conditions turn unfavorable mitigates losses before they escalate, providing a safety net for traders.
- Exposure Control: Effective management of exposure is critical. It involves recognizing the total risk one is willing to accept per trade and ensuring that the edge is effectively utilized without jeopardizing the account during adverse market conditions. One effective way to achieve this goal is to maintain a balance between opposing bull and bear exposures by dynamically and algorithmically adjusting the portfolio and positions.
Conclusion
Consistent profitability requires a deep understanding and applying the Universal Statistical Edge Principle
and implementing robust risk management practices, including exposure control and timely hedging. The ability to use HTI
to condition future trading decisions is crucial in moving from merely guessing in the markets to trading with a true rational
edge. Anyone committed to trading should integrate these principles into their strategy in order not to create fallacious trading procedures.
Learn More
For a deeper understanding of these concepts, you can consult the seminal
breakthrough paper or this more accessible
reduction.